Backport ettercap - Historique des versions

imported>SylvainBeucler le 14 septembre 2006 à 15:03

2006-09-14T15:03:23Z

82.238.35.175 : note about different versioning conventions

2006-09-10T00:08:00Z

note about different versioning conventions

82.238.35.175 : naming convention update

2006-09-09T23:12:14Z

naming convention update

82.238.35.175 le 23 juin 2006 à 19:22

2006-06-23T19:22:28Z

82.238.35.175 le 23 juin 2006 à 19:14

2006-06-23T19:14:08Z

Nouvelle page

This one is as simple as [[Backport par2]], except for the strange version: 1:0.7.3-1+b1.

As explained at [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines], version +b1 means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a
different build environment).

← Version précédente		Version du 14 septembre 2006 à 15:03
Ligne 1 :		Ligne 1 :
−	This one is as simple as [[Backport ~~par2~~]], except for the strange version: <code>1:0.7.3-1+b1</code>.	+	This one is as simple as [[Backport dar]], except for the strange version: <code>1:0.7.3-1+b1</code>.

	As explained at [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines], version <code>+b1</code> means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a different build environment).		As explained at [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines], version <code>+b1</code> means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a different build environment).

← Version précédente		Version du 10 septembre 2006 à 00:08
Ligne 6 :		Ligne 6 :

	So the source version actually is <code>1:0.7.3-1</code>, and hence the bpo version will be <code>1:0.7.3-1~bpo.1</code>.		So the source version actually is <code>1:0.7.3-1</code>, and hence the bpo version will be <code>1:0.7.3-1~bpo.1</code>.
		+
		+	Note: in the [http://backports.org/debian/pool/main/e/ettercap/ backports archive], the package is called differently: this is because we used a different versioning convention at that time. You can ignore this discrepency.

← Version précédente		Version du 9 septembre 2006 à 23:12
Ligne 5 :		Ligne 5 :
	<code>1:</code> is a version prefix, usually because of a non-incremental version change [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version], we don't care about it.		<code>1:</code> is a version prefix, usually because of a non-incremental version change [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version], we don't care about it.

−	So the source version actually is <code>1:0.7.3-1</code>, and hence the bpo version will be <code>1:0.7.3-~~0bpo1~~</code>.	+	So the source version actually is <code>1:0.7.3-1</code>, and hence the bpo version will be <code>1:0.7.3-1~bpo.1</code>.

@@ Ligne 1 : / Ligne 1 : @@
-This one is as simple as [[Backport par2]], except for the strange version: 1:0.7.3-1+b1.
+This one is as simple as [[Backport par2]], except for the strange version: <code>1:0.7.3-1+b1</code>.
-As explained at [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines], version +b1 means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a
+As explained at [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines], version <code>+b1</code> means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a different build environment).
 different build environment).