Différences entre versions de « Backport ettercap »
Sauter à la navigation
Sauter à la recherche
(naming convention update) |
imported>SylvainBeucler m |
||
| (Une version intermédiaire par un autre utilisateur non affichée) | |||
| Ligne 1 : | Ligne 1 : | ||
| − | This one is as simple as [[Backport | + | This one is as simple as [[Backport dar]], except for the strange version: <code>1:0.7.3-1+b1</code>. |
As explained at [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines], version <code>+b1</code> means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a different build environment). | As explained at [http://www.us.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines], version <code>+b1</code> means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a different build environment). | ||
| Ligne 6 : | Ligne 6 : | ||
So the source version actually is <code>1:0.7.3-1</code>, and hence the bpo version will be <code>1:0.7.3-1~bpo.1</code>. | So the source version actually is <code>1:0.7.3-1</code>, and hence the bpo version will be <code>1:0.7.3-1~bpo.1</code>. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Note: in the [http://backports.org/debian/pool/main/e/ettercap/ backports archive], the package is called differently: this is because we used a different versioning convention at that time. You can ignore this discrepency. | ||
Version actuelle datée du 14 septembre 2006 à 16:03
This one is as simple as Backport dar, except for the strange version: 1:0.7.3-1+b1.
As explained at [1], version +b1 means "1st recompilation", ie the package was recompiled without any change in the source code (but probably with a different build environment).
1: is a version prefix, usually because of a non-incremental version change [2], we don't care about it.
So the source version actually is 1:0.7.3-1, and hence the bpo version will be 1:0.7.3-1~bpo.1.
Note: in the backports archive, the package is called differently: this is because we used a different versioning convention at that time. You can ignore this discrepency.